Sunday, June 03, 2007

 

Surge...in Violence

Bush's "surge" is working brilliantly, if the goal was a surge in attacks:

On ABC's _This Week_ newscast this morning, 37 US soldiers were added to the death toll, and there are also reports of surges in civilian casualties in Iraq.

Then there's this from the Washington Post:
"As U.S. troops push more deeply into Baghdad and its volatile outskirts, Iraqi insurgents are using increasingly sophisticated and lethal means of attack, including bigger roadside bombs that are resulting in greater numbers of American fatalities relative to the number of wounded.

May, with 127 American fatalities, was the third-deadliest month for U.S. troops since the 2003 invasion. As in the conflict's two deadliest months for U.S. troops -- 137 died in November 2004 and 135 in April of that year -- the overarching cause of May's toll is the ongoing, large-scale U.S. military operations. Gen. Simmons called the high U.S. losses in May "a very painful and heart-wrenching experience."

We can expect more painful and heart-wrenching experiences from such painfully wrong-headed policies of "staying the course" in Iraq.

Attacks on U.S. Troops in Iraq Grow in Lethality, Complexity - washingtonpost.com

 

Electing an Egghead

This Washington Post article by Eugene Robinson makes a case for why we need to ensure that we elect a next president who is smart, not a good old boy we'd like to have a beer with and who charms us with his folksy speech:

"One thing that should be clear to anyone who's been paying attention these past few years is that we need to go out and get ourselves the smartest president we can find. We need a brainiac president, a regular Mister or Miss Smarty-Pants. We need to elect the kid you hated in high school, the teacher's pet with perfect grades.

When I look at what the next president will have to deal with, I don't see much that can be solved with just a winning smile, a firm handshake and a ton of resolve. I see conundrums, dilemmas, quandaries, impasses, gnarly thickets of fateful possibility with no obvious way out. Iraq is the obvious place he or she will have to start; I want a president smart enough to figure out how to minimize the damage.

I want a president who reads newspapers, who reads books other than those that confirm his worldview, who bones up on Persian history before deciding how to deal with Iran's ambitious dreams of glory. I want a president who understands the relationship between energy policy at home and U.S. interests in the Middle East -- and who's smart enough to form his or her own opinions, not just rely on what old friends in the oil business say.

I want a president who believes in empirical fact, whose understanding of spirituality is complete enough to know that faith is "the evidence of things not seen" and who knows that for things that can be seen, the relevant evidence is fact, not belief. I want a president -- and it's amazing that I even have to put this on my wish list -- smart enough to know that Darwin was right.

I want the next president to be intellectually curious -- and also intellectually honest. I want him or her to understand the details, not just the big picture. I won't complain if the next president occasionally uses a word I have to look up.

The conventional wisdom says that voters are turned off when candidates put on showy displays of highfalutin brilliance. I hope that's wrong. I hope people understand how complicated and difficult the next president's job will be, and how much of a difference some real candlepower would make.

I don't want the candidates to pretend to be average people, because why would we choose an ordinary person for such an extraordinary job? I want to see what they've got -- how much they know, how readily they absorb new information, how effectively they analyze problems and evaluate solutions. If the next president is almost always the smartest person in the room, I won't mind a bit. After all, we're not in high school anymore."

Voters need to grow up and stop voting for candidates they "like" and start looking at policies and who is best equipped, intellectually and ethically, to lead us back from the failed current policies.

Eugene Robinson - An Egghead for the Oval Office - washingtonpost.com

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?