Thursday, August 04, 2005
Bush's Existence Disproves "Theory" of Intelligent Design
On Monday, Bush claimed that religious perspectives on creationism should be taught alongside scientific theories in our nation's classrooms. No wonder our students are lagging behind other countries in the sciences. This, along with Bush's denial of global warming and backwards view on stem cell research (which is out of step with the majority of Americans) is all part of his grand scheme to bring scientific progress to a halt and return us to the dark ages.
Bush's science adviser, John H. Marburger 3rd, scrambled to play down the president's remarks. Marburger said in a telephone interview that "evolution is the cornerstone of modern biology" and "intelligent design is not a scientific concept." Marburger also said that Mr. Bush's remarks should be interpreted to mean that the president believes that intelligent design should be discussed as part of the "social context" in science classes.
This denial aside, isn't Bush's very existence living proof that there is no "intelligent" design? And if Bush needs further proof of the theory of evolution, all he has to do is look in the mirror (and all we have to do is click on the link below):
George W. Bush or Chimpanzee?
Quite a resemblence, isn't there?
Bush's science adviser, John H. Marburger 3rd, scrambled to play down the president's remarks. Marburger said in a telephone interview that "evolution is the cornerstone of modern biology" and "intelligent design is not a scientific concept." Marburger also said that Mr. Bush's remarks should be interpreted to mean that the president believes that intelligent design should be discussed as part of the "social context" in science classes.
This denial aside, isn't Bush's very existence living proof that there is no "intelligent" design? And if Bush needs further proof of the theory of evolution, all he has to do is look in the mirror (and all we have to do is click on the link below):
George W. Bush or Chimpanzee?
Quite a resemblence, isn't there?